Writing effective collections emails is a balancing act. If the tone is too soft, the invoice remains unpaid. If the tone is too aggressive, you risk damaging a long-term customer relationship. Most credit departments rely on static templates stored in their ERP. These templates are rigid, treating a strategic partner with a minor administrative delay exactly the same as a high-risk customer who is habitually late. Credit managers often spend hours manually rewriting these templates for high-value accounts to ensure the tone is correct, slowing the cash collection process.
Generative AI offers a new way to handle this workflow. Instead of relying on a single static template, credit teams can use tools like Dunning Doctor to draft communications that adapt to each account's specific context. This guide explores how to apply this technology safely and effectively.
The traditional approach to dunning letters has functional limitations that result in low response rates.
Standard ERP templates operate on simple logic: if an invoice is X days past due, send Letter Y. The system doesn't know why the payment is late. It sends the same demand letter whether the customer has a valid dispute, a missing PO number, or a cash flow problem. This lack of context makes the communication feel robotic and easy to ignore.
A customer who has paid on time for ten years shouldn't receive a generic "Final Notice" threat because of a two-day delay caused by a bank holiday. Rigid templates can't distinguish between negligence and administrative error. Sending an overly aggressive letter to a good customer creates unnecessary friction for the sales team.
Ideally, a collector would write a personal note for every past-due invoice. In practice, the volume of invoices makes this impossible. Teams resort to bulk generic emails because they don't have time to personalize outreach. This results in low open rates and delayed payments.
Using generative AI in collections isn't about handing over the process to a machine. It's about using the technology to draft better messages faster. Here's a practical framework for integrating this capability into a credit workflow.
An AI model can't write a good letter without facts. The most effective systems pull specific data points before drafting the message. Relevant data includes payment history (is this customer usually on time?), invoice age (how long has the debt been outstanding?), and recent interactions (did the customer promise to pay last week? Is there an active dispute?).
When the draft includes these details, the recipient sees that the sender understands the situation. This increases the likelihood of a reply. Dunning Doctor is trained on actual B2B payment data, allowing it to incorporate these contextual signals into collection messages that get 3X higher response rates than generic templates.
The primary value of generative AI in this context is tone control. You can configure the system to adjust the language based on the risk category of the customer:
This segmentation ensures that good customers are treated with respect while risky accounts receive appropriate pressure. Tools like Dunning Doctor optimize language for psychological impact, using proven phrasing that increases payment urgency without damaging relationships.
AI should draft the message, but a human should review it—especially for high-value accounts or complex disputes. The workflow changes from "writing from scratch" to "review and approve." A collector might see a draft, make one small edit, and hit send. This reduces the time spent on each account from minutes to seconds, allowing the team to cover more accounts in a day.
Moving away from static templates to adaptive, AI-drafted communications has measurable impacts on department performance.
Customers are more likely to respond to an email that references specific details about their account. Generic "To Whom It May Concern" emails are often filtered or deleted. Personalized context signals that a real person is monitoring the account. Dunning Doctor has been proven to generate 3X higher response rates by optimizing message structure, timing recommendations, and psychological triggers based on real B2B transaction data.
Aggressive collections tactics can cause customers to switch to competitors. By ensuring the tone matches the relationship, credit teams protect future revenue while still enforcing payment terms.
When the drafting process is automated, collectors spend less time typing and more time on high-value tasks. They can focus on phone calls for the most difficult accounts, complex dispute resolution, and negotiating payment plans.
If you're considering using generative AI for collections correspondence, use this checklist to ensure a safe rollout:
The goal of using AI in collections is to remove the repetitive burden of writing hundreds of emails while improving engagement and accelerating cash flow. By adapting the message to the customer's behavior and history, teams can improve response rates without damaging relationships.
Collectors spending hours rewriting ERP templates? Static dunning letters generating low response rates? High-value customers receiving generic "Final Notice" threats? Dunning Doctor is a free AI tool that rewrites collection emails using language proven to get 3X higher response rates. Unlike generic AI models trained on internet content, Dunning Doctor is trained on actual B2B transactions and payment data from Bectran's Order-to-Cash platform. The tool optimizes tone based on customer risk level (helpful for strategic accounts, firm for medium risk, urgent for high risk), incorporates specific account context (payment history, invoice age, recent interactions), and provides psychological triggers that increase payment urgency without damaging relationships—allowing collectors to focus on high-value tasks like dispute resolution and payment plan negotiation. Try Dunning Doctor for free.
300+ tools for efficiency and risk management