Construction businesses rely on trade credit for a significant portion of B2B sales. Understanding current B2B payment practices helps credit teams manage cash flow and mitigate risk. Current B2B payment practices include navigating varied payment terms, addressing fraud, and using technology to streamline operations.

Construction businesses in North America rely heavily on trade credit. On average, firms conduct 43% of their business-to-business (B2B) sales on credit terms. The remaining sales are paid upfront. The balance of upfront payments shows a cautious yet established use of trade credit across the region.

‍

Most businesses offer payment terms within a standard 30-day credit window. However, medium-to-large construction companies often provide longer payment times to their business customers. Longer payment times are crucial for maintaining strong supplier relationships and supporting volume growth in project-based work.

‍

Payment policies in the US are similar to those in the rest of North America. Trend data from 2026 shows that most US suppliers have not significantly changed their payment terms in recent months. More companies are offering longer payment times than shorter ones, indicating a stable, yet adaptable, approach to B2B payments in the construction sector.

‍

This stability does not mean a lack of challenges. Underlying liquidity pressures and growing insolvency concerns create a complex payment risk landscape for North American businesses. Credit teams must monitor these trends closely. They need to adjust credit policies.

Construction payment terms often differ significantly from generic Net 30 arrangements. Progress billing is a common practice, where payments are tied to specific project completion milestones. Payments tied to specific project completion milestones mean invoices do not always reflect a simple delivery of goods.

‍

Retainage further complicates payment schedules. A percentage of the payment, typically 5-10%, is held back until the project reaches substantial completion or final acceptance. The holdback practice secures performance but creates significant working capital strain for material suppliers and subcontractors.

‍

Short pays and deductions are frequent occurrences in construction accounts receivable. Common reasons include unapproved change orders, back charges for rework, or disputes over material quantities delivered. A customer might also claim damaged product or tax discrepancies as reasons for a short payment.

‍

Resolving these disputes demands clear documentation and efficient communication. Credit teams must track each claim, including the reason and supporting evidence. They route these claims to the correct internal departments, such as project management or sales, for investigation and resolution. Claim routing ensures accurate cash application and minimizes unapplied cash balances.

B2B fraud incidents pose a substantial threat to construction businesses. The average loss per B2B fraud incident is $50,000. For companies experiencing multiple incidents per month, this can quickly lead to six-figure annual losses. Professional criminal operations now target specific loss amounts, sometimes just under $100,000, to avoid triggering FBI investigation thresholds.

‍

Fraudsters create synthetic identities using AI-generated documents. AI-generated documents include fake Secretary of State certificates, tax IDs, and driver’s licenses. They also manipulate legitimate documents, such as using the same bank statements for multiple credit applications with different names. AI watermark detection is often necessary to catch these generated documents.

‍

Digital footprint red flags are critical for identifying fraudulent applications. Credit teams verify email domains. They check for mismatches between domain creation dates and claimed business ages. They also look for impersonation domains with slight variations, like "abc-distributions.com" instead of "abc-distribution.com". Geographic inconsistencies, such as an IP address location differing from the claimed business address, also signal risk.

‍

Account takeover scenarios are another concern. Fraudsters compromise legitimate business emails or use voice impersonation to authorize orders. Bust-out fraud involves building a legitimate payment history with small orders over several months, then placing a final, large order that is never paid. Credit teams must deploy layered defense systems to combat these evolving threats.

Payment portals offer customers flexible options for managing their invoices. Customers can make one-time payments without needing to register for an account. One-time payments are useful for infrequent buyers. Repeat customers can register. They gain access to a personalized dashboard.

‍

The customer dashboard typically displays an invoice summary, aging breakdowns, and payment history. Customers can view their total balance, invoices not yet due, and past due amounts. They can also download statements of open invoices for their records.

‍

When a customer short pays an invoice, the portal can require a reason. The system allows the customer to select a claim type, such as "damaged product" or "tax reasoning," and add comments. They can also attach supporting documents as proof to bulk up the claim. The portal routes the claims to the appropriate internal team for review and resolution.

‍

Credit card payments are common, but businesses often apply restrictions to manage costs and risk. These controls include limiting the total payment amount allowed on a credit card, for example, to $10,000. Businesses can also surcharge customers for credit card use, passing along a chosen percentage of the processing fee. Some companies even eliminate certain credit card providers, like Amex, from their accepted payment methods.

Technology streamlines B2B payment processes from credit application to cash application. A unified platform can manage the entire workflow and reduces the need for multiple integrations.

‍

Automated verification tools detect fraud by cross-referencing multiple bureau reports and analyzing device intelligence. These tools perform real-time checks, identifying red flags like VPN usage or blacklisted IP addresses. This speeds up identity verification and significantly reduces fraud exposure during the onboarding process.

‍

Credit teams use technology to manage complex payment scenarios specific to construction. Complex payment scenarios include matching remittances to progress bills and retainage releases. Remittances often involve partial payments across multiple projects. Automated cash application helps reconcile these intricate payments. Cash application reduces unapplied cash.

‍

The right system integrates seamlessly with existing ERPs, such as SAP or Oracle, ensuring verified data flows across all systems. This complements core project management functions without replacing them. It provides a unified view of credit and AR, allowing credit managers to make informed decisions based on accurate, real-time data.

Bectran's platform streamlines B2B payment practices with online applications, payment portals, and fraud prevention. This is general information, not legal or tax advice. Review your payment processes with our team.